Article “Esbjörn Bergman” in Swedish Wikipedia has 1.9 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025).
In June 2025 the article “Esbjörn Bergman” was edited by 1 authors in Swedish Wikipedia and written by 1 authors in all languages.
Since the creation of article “Esbjörn Bergman”, its content was written by 4 registered users of Swedish Wikipedia and edited by 4 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 2 times in Swedish Wikipedia and cited 2 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Swedish: #149900 03.2024 |
Global: #6616842 03.2024 |
| Best Rank | Swedish: #5321 03.2024 |
Global: #988479 03.2024 |
On 5 March 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Iran, Ali Khamenei, 2026 Iran war, Jeffrey Epstein, Kurds, Strait of Hormuz, Yakovlev Yak-130, Donald Trump, Azerbaijan, Kristi Noem.
In Swedish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Fössta tossdan i mass, Malin Gramer, Carl Falk (musikproducent), Iran, Kristi Noem, Bodil Malmsten, Felipe Leiva Wenger, Marcus Oscarsson, Frej Larsson, Ali Khamenei.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.46+0+0+5.26+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
